Friday, December 16, 2016

Report card for Pro Monument Campaign Gets all D’s

By Janet Wilcox

The campaign driven by the Conservation Lands Foundation over the past two years to designate the Bears Ears in Utah as a National Monument has promoted Disparity, Discrimination, Deceit, Divisiveness, Disillusionment, Dissembling, and Debt.

Disparity between states:
There is a huge disparity between eastern states who have large amounts of private land and thus the wealth, and most western states who have low median incomes and little private land. There is a correlation between private land and wealth.  Former San Juan Commissioner Bill Redd often stated, “The wealth of a people, or a country is always linked to land.”  75.2% of Utah’s land is public. Only 24.8% is privately owned.  Only two other states in the nation have more public land than Utah – Alaska and Nevada.  Our neighbors in Colorado have twice as much private land - 56.7% and their public land is 43.3%.  

San Juan county has an even more dismal ratio-- 92% of the land is already public and is managed by BLM, Forest Service and five existing parks, monuments, and reservations. This is why this is a poor county.  If the option of “multiple use” is done away because of a National Monument,  many jobs that foster self-reliance and freedom from debt will also be impacted, thus there will be even more disparity. Since Obama took office in 2008, he has set aside more than 550 million acres in two dozen monuments — the most of any president in U.S. history.  Such wanton disregard of local economy has become a legacy of disparity and despair, nothing a President of the "United" States should be promoting.


Federally Fueled Discrimination:  
There exists not only discrimination in the United States between those who have private land and those who don’t, it also exists when citizens live in areas where they are prevented from using initiative and free enterprise to earn a better living.  Wealthy lobbies have poured millions into Obama’s environmental campaign for more monuments, which increases the disparity between the haves and the have nots. Other rural areas fighting this same “Folly Green Giant” have the same disadvantage.  Though San Juan County is rich in land, it is ranked 29th out of 29 Utah counties based on per-capita, annual income.  Another layer of discrimination appears when schools become underfunded or under achieving because of environmentally imposed restrictions on lands which can no longer provide funds for school children.  San Juan County’s tax valuation which determines budget decisions, is based on roughly 20 companies. All but two are tied to the land. Even Verizon, which is a leading cellphone provider, is tied to the land. That is why sections of San Juan county land must continue to be multi-use.
Ironically, some areas in the proposed 1.9 million acres do NOT even meet the definition of “public lands.”  This includes 43 grazing allotments, 661 water-right infrastructures, 151,000 acres of state trust land, 18,000 acres of private property, and hundreds of miles of roads and infrastructure which are granted a RS2477 right-of-way.  These lands are legally private or state owned and must continue to be available for private enterprises and access. 

The Environmental Lobby Discredits State Sovereignty, laws, and freedoms.  Lobbies working for the "Folly Green Giant"  make Utah sound like a thief when congressmen and state officials take a stand to protect and use SITLA lands which are scattered throughout the proposed areaMerri Shumway, SJC school board member explains: Four sections of every township was designated at statehood for the purpose of supporting public schools. The State Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) has the responsibility to manage these lands that are in trust for school children in the state of Utah. The lands that do not have the potential to generate revenue are sold off or traded for land that can produce revenue to support public schools. When land is sold, the money from the sale is deposited into the Permanent School Fund. Interest and dividends from the fund are distributed to each public school in the state of Utah each year. Community councils that consist of school faculty and parents of students attending the school make the decision of how the SITLA money is spent.”  Those pockets of state land need to be utilized for the benefit of local schools.

The Environmental Lobby is Dishonest. 
The tribal coalition organized by the Conservation Lands Foundation, is NOT a grass roots effort as advertised, but is planned, paid for, and orchestrated by behind the scenes wealthy millionaires, such as Hansjorg Wyss.  According to Dave Skinner a Montana writer, Wyss has done more than any other man in the world to bring rural states to their knees by donating millions to environmental campaigns.  The PEW Foundation, Hewlet Packard, and dozens of other foundations get tax benefits for donating to environmental causes.  Their $$$ has created a huge slanted campaign for more land. This Green Machine uses scare tactics and hyperbole as it exaggerates what is happening and what will happen if a monument is not designated. Overused phrases such as, “rampant looting” and “desecration of land” has caused environmental hysteria and misled thousands of people who do not see the true picture. By up-playing negativity without giving actual facts, the nation has been led to believe local people don’t care about the land.  Nothing could be further from the truth. Good citizens have been protecting this area for generations, but there will always be those who are up to no good, just as occurs in cities on the east and west coast.  Establishing a monument will not stop that, and in addition increased visitation will only bring more vandalism while eliminating traditional uses. This has occurred in Grand Staircase Escalante since its designation 20 years ago, and we have no reason to believe it will be different here.


A recent incident in the Bears Ears area of Comb Ridge was caused by Fort Lewis College students who were supposedly supervised and educated. They didn’t just leave footprints, but graffiti.  This paradox plagues every preservation effort. In order to protect special places, advocates must get public support. To do that, they need to let the public know why the place is so special, to let the masses in on their secrets. Such a campaign acts as a travel council publicist with many of the same negative effects.
Whether it is outright deceit, or poorly studied economics, the Folly Green Giant, has also promised Native people that there will be new jobs through tourism and “Industrial-strength recreation” (see recent article in Canyon Zephyr by Jim Stiles.) This dangling carrot strategy would replace ranching, and fossil fuel industries in SJC, yet expect people to drive hundreds of miles to get here while utilizing their smart phones and gear which is at least partially dependent upon fossil fuel products.

Tourist towns like Moab and Jackson Hole, Wyoming are too expensive for middle income families to live in. They are sustained by people who must work 2-3 part time jobs to maintain a household.  People who actually reside there aren’t able to purchase homes on minimum wage salaries.  The median household income in San Juan County is already 4th from the bottom in the state, but interestingly both Grand and Wayne county which are adjacent to National parks and Monuments have an even LOWER median income, yet the façade of tourism makes outsiders think things are booming because of all the toursits. (http://img.ksl.com/slc/2607/260770/26077053.jpg)



Divisiveness:   The CLF strategy of forming a native coalition has ended up dividing tribes and sometimes families.  Environmental CEO's and strategists never made any effort to inform tribal members at large, but instead gathered hand picked consultant/leaders to represent their cause.  It makes one question why they so readily joined this crusade, when they have much to lose?  There must be thousands of tribal members both in and out of Utah who have no idea what Bears Ears is all about. Yet supposedly 5 tribes endorse it.  Commissioner Rebecca Benally warned early on, “Trusting the federal government has historically resulted in broken promises for Native Americans."  As native people in Utah started investigating what was at stake the tables turned and coalition members of the Ute Mt. leadership were voted out of office as a result.

Another D goes to Dissembling or pretending to support one idea, when in fact you support a differing philosophy. Many of us heard Navajo leaders speak passionately against oil drilling at the Sally Jewell hearing in July, yet ironically the Navajo tribe is in the process of trying to buy Resolute Oil, the #1 tax payer in San Juan County.  So obviously, it’s not the issue of owning an oil company or drilling that is the problem, but who gets the benefits from it.  This certainly sends a mixed message from the Navajo nation. San Juan County Navajos have always been at the bottom of the totem pole of the Navajo Tribe.  Why some Utah Navajos would support the Navajo Nation's stance makes no sense, unless they were dangled big "green" carrots.

Finally there is the BIG D words – Debt and Deficit.  The Nation’s $20 Trillion debt has put all of us in debtor’s prison.  We are being held hostage by land collateral. We have given away our birthright. We see the results of national debt when existing National parks and Monuments are put under a two-year deferment. Thirteen of Utah’s parks are hampered because of no maintenance to the tune of $278,094,606.  The maintenance deferment nationwide totals $ 11,493,168,812. The federal government is not taking care of existing needs. This further illustrates government inefficiency; as a nation we cannot continue to spend money on wants. We must focus on needs. Leave San Juan lands managed as they are with an emphasis on cooperation and community/county-wide efforts to protect and live in hoz ro’.  A National Monument is not the answer to peace and protection. By working together, we can eliminate those D’s.  It's obvious we need a non-partisan mediator not a heavy handed dictator.
by Janet Wilcox



Saturday, December 10, 2016

Bear Essentials Dec. 10, 2016

Bear Essentials Dec. 10-17
 Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (and women) to do nothing.”
No matter the omens of doom, and naysayers who have never even helped in this urgent issue, Stewards of San Juan County are determined to represent our county, our freedoms, and to speak out as long as there is hope.  It’s possible some of you have only written once or twice; that needs to be substantially increased when you are fighting a formidable foe. We hope you will help today, and throughout these last weeks of the year. Write and call OFTEN
**TOP Priority
1.      Efforts must continue if we want to stop the environmental lobby momentum:

Call 
202-456-1111 or 202-456-1414 between the hours of 7am - 3 pm MST to leave a comment AND leave the same comment online at https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

Possible script (or you can personalize it as you see fit):
"Hello, my name is _____ and I am a resident of Blanding, Utah. I am calling to express my strong opposition to the proposed Bears Ears National Monument in San Juan County  Please do not designate another monument in Utah. I stand with our elected city, county, and Utah's ENTIRE elected congressional delegation, as well as the two local tribes, in opposing this monument. Do not support the environmental lobby.  Rural Americans and their livelihood matters.

2.     If you need help writing letters, or organizing them, come to the Blanding library tomorrow Saturday, Dec. 10—1-3 PM . Sample letters and addresses available.  If you have a lap top come help with e-mailing or drop your letter off today
Write letters to these key people immediately, especially if you are mailing them.  The last five are all Senior advisors to President Obama.  E-mail letters could be sent every day. 

President Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500

Call to comment: 
202-456-1111
wrote: 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

Christy Goldfuss, Chair
Council on Environmental Quality
722 Jackson Place NW
Washington, DC 20503
Email: 
chair@ceq.eop.gov

Brian Deese, Senior Energy Advisor
Department of Energy
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
Neil Kornze, Director
Bureau of Land Management
Mail Stop 2134 LM
1849 C St. NW.
Washington DC 20240
e-mail:
director@blm.gov
nkornze@blm.gov
The following are advisors to the president:
Please add this link at the bottom of your e-mails with this statement.  This document includes further reasons you should not designate Bears Ears National Monument. 
Reading for this week.  
--This is a great article showing the past history of National Monuments and how Bears Ears rose to the center stage of the CLF campaign.  Jim Stiles details the trail of magabucks spent via green extremists, and the impact on rural towns and fragile landscapes.
--Should the EPA be dissolved?                                                                                              



Friday, December 9, 2016

Bayles letter to Energy Advisor

Dear Brian Deese, Senior Energy Advisor

The residents of San Juan County, which include the Navajo and Ute tribes, strongly oppose the designation of a Bears Ears National Monument as proposed by the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition. Emotion aside, there are lawful, valid reasons why we oppose this monument. The proposal itself is severely deficient and requests actions by the President that are contrary to law.

The BEIT Coalition claims that they are “local by residence to the Four Corners Country.” However, the “Four Corners Country” is not an institutional entity that creates law and policies that govern land use – it’s simply a region. Members of the Coalition are not residents of San Juan County. They are not even residents of Utah. They do not have legal jurisdiction over the Bears Ears area, and by claiming they are “local” via Four Corners Country they are trying to move an already established goal post and define their OWN goal post of what it means to be “local”. That’s fine, they have the right to believe and express how they feel. However, that does not give them actual rights to the land; only political bodies can make policy decisions about this land. “Four Corners Country” is not a citizen, or even a member, of any of those actual functioning jurisdictional entities. The proposal itself disregards no less than 18 land use planning efforts. A non-government organization such as the Coalition should never have the power to trump sovereign State rights, nor duly elected officials, no matter how much money they have been given from outside special interest groups.

Local tribes realize that their own tribal leaders have been bought out by outside special interest groups. Recently, the Ute tribe from White Mesa – one community that will be directly affected by this monument – voted out three of their representatives who are a part of the Coalition. The community was never made aware that a Bears Ears monument was even being discussed and subsequently, they never had the chance to voice their opposition until recently. Evidence of this is provided in the following video with a comment made by Suzette Morris, a Ute resident of White Mesa, to Regina Lopez-Whiteskunk, former Ute Mountain Ute Chairwoman, at a recent tribal meeting in White Mesa, Utah https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa_TyQzLKiI.

In the proposal, the Coalition makes claims of “rampant looting” and “grave robbing” and states that “more than a dozen serious looting cases were reported between May 2014 and April 2015.” However, those claims were never cited, much less verified. In fact, those claims are in stark contrast with reports from local law enforcement, the US DOI briefing on looting activities, and the BLM.

The most important point, albeit upsetting and downright disturbing, that I want to address is the dishonesty that the Coalition has shown since day one. They claim that the seeds of their proposal were planted and nourished by local Navajos, when in reality, it was in fact environmental groups that planted the seeds of this monument into the soil of these tribes. In 2014 a meeting of the Conservation Lands Foundation was held in San Francisco where board members discussed the progress of what was then known as the “Cedar Mesa campaign” (later it would be known as the Bears Ears proposal). Chairman Ed Norton was quoted in official minutes questioning if their group was “hitching our success to the Navajo and if so what would happen if we separate from them or disagree with them. Without the support of the Navajo Nation, the White House probably would not act; currently we are relying on the success of our Navajo partners.”  

The Coalition does not have the local tribes’ best interest in mind. They proved that by ignoring the entire Aneth Chapter of the Navajo Nation by submitting the chapter's 2010 resolution in support of the monument as part of their October 2015 official proposal, when in fact the chapter rescinded in August of 2015 and officially announced their opposition to the monument.

Many surveys have been generated regarding public opinion on the proposed monument. The one that the Coalition most often promotes claims “55% of Utahns support a Bears Ears National Monument.” This poll in particular was conducted by Mike Matz from Pew Charitable Trusts organization. It should be noted that Matz headed the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA-one of the major financial proponents for the monument) from 1993-2000.  He used Public Opinion Strategies and the Benenson Strategy Group whose motto is “BSG is a strategic research consultancy that marries language expertise with innovative research to frame choices so that your brand is the only answer.” http://www.sltrib.com/news/4224034-155/poll-most-utahns-favor-a-bears. The poll included a phone survey of only 600 registered voters in Utah, yet not one San Juan County resident nor one Native American, was surveyed. Those two populations are the ones that will be most affected by this monument. http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/analysis/2016/08/11/new-poll-utahans-support-protections-for-bears-ears-area.

These are just a few of the reasons that locals, myself included, are so against this proposed monument. If it was the right thing to do, there would be at least some support from local Navajos, Utes, Anglos, and Hispanics alike - but there is not. If you want this land to continue being protected, because it is protected by BLM, Forest Service, and the good stewards of San Juan, please work with local county residents and elected officials.
A National Monument should be an honor to an area, not a punishment – and it should not be done TO the residents, but rather WITH the residents. I am attaching a copy of a conversation I had with a Navajo man who is a life-long resident of Bluff, Utah. Whether Bears Ears becomes a monument or not, the U.S. Department of Interior, the Council on Environmental Quality, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the President of the United States himself needs to see that the Bears Ears National Monument proposal is nothing but a Trojan Horse that will undoubtedly destroy this area.

Jami Bayles



Keep Writing and Calling

Call 202-456-1111 or 202-456-1414 between the hours of 7am - 3 pm MST to leave a comment AND leave the same comment online at https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

Mailing addresses:
The President.
The White House.
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20500.
Christy Goldfuss, Chair
Council on Environmental Quality
722 Jackson Place NW
Washington, DC 20503
Email: chair@ceq.eop.gov
Brian Deese, Senior Energy Advisor
Department of Energy
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500

The Honorable Sally Jewell,
Secretary of the Interior
U.S. Department of the Interior
1849 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20240
e-mail Secretary_jewell@ios.doi.gov
Neil Kornze, Director
Bureau of Land Management
Mail Stop 2134 LM
1849 C St. NW.
Washington DC 20240
e-mail: director@blm.gov
nkornze@blm.gov

Thursday, December 8, 2016

How the Battle goes in West Virginia

Randy and Kirsten Sharp have been fighting against a Nat'l Monument Designation in West Virginia for nearly 2 years now.  This was their latest e-mail:  
According to our senators they are opposed to it  as a few weeks ago. I have tried Rep Jenkins' office twice but have yet to hear from him. A little worried about him as some river people in another area has been pushing him on this. Whatever happens we need to look at the long term and try to get the Antiquities Act revoked or at least voted on by congress. Keep  me informed as to what is going on and wish you luck.     Randy

Published in October, 2016 -- The Push is on in W. Virginia as well
What will be President Obama’s legacy? The Affordable Care Act? The death of Osama bin Laden? Or perhaps his public lands legacy. President Obama has designated or expanded 27 national monuments and protected more than 550 million acres of public lands and waters, more than any other president.
Unfortunately, only 23 of more than 120 current national monuments are in the East. West Virginia currently has none. However, a group of Mountain State conservation advocates, businesspeople, outdoor recreation enthusiasts and other citizens has organized to secure a federal designation for the proposed Birthplace of Rivers National Monument.
“There are no landscape-scale national monuments in the East,” says David Lillard, special projects manager with the West Virginia Rivers Coalition. “There’s a need and a worthiness in the East as well.”Why create a national monument?

 First, says Lillard, a national monument designation, unlike a national forest, would permanently protect the land from industrial development, a significant step in this fossil fuel-rich state.Second, this measure would help ensure the purity of the rivers, a critical step given that millions of people downstream depend on them every day for fresh, clean drinking water. Just two and a half years ago, a massive chemical spill into the Elk River polluted more than 300,000 people’s tap water, which highlighted the vital need to protect this resource. Clean headwaters also facilitate positive recreation experiences downstream for fishing and paddling. More than 90 percent of West Virginia’s native trout streams fall within the proposed monument’s borders. And creek boaters flock to the headwaters of these rivers.

Finally, the designation of the monument would significantly boost tourism revenue throughout the area. According to an economic impact study commissioned by the West Virginia Wilderness Coalition, the monument’s designation would create 143 jobs, increase visitor-related spending in communities surrounding the monument by 42 percent, and generate more than $14.5 million in economic output annually. Similarly, land-management research group Headwaters Economics studied the local economies of communities bordering or adjacent to 17 national monuments in the western United States from 1982 to 2011, and they found that jobs grew at four times the rate of similar communities that didn’t have a national monument as a neighbor.Third, says Lillard, a monument designation would help guarantee that any future logging remains at a sustainable level.  
Later in the article it says: "Around the beginning of this year, the focus of this campaign shifted strongly toward the president,” Lillard explains. “He has indicated there will be more monuments designated. We’ve been meeting with his administration’s monument people for a long time, and they’re very interested.”
A presidential precedent of sorts exists for departing commanders-in-chief to establish 11th-hour public lands on their way out the door. For example, during the first seven years of President Clinton’s two terms in office, he designated one national monument. In his last year, he established 19, with seven of those only becoming official in his last week and a half in the White House.
- Read more at: http://appvoices.org/2016/10/07/monumental-momentum/#sthash.WcCn225C.dpuf



This second article was published 2 years ago when the environmental push began there: 
Read more:

Notice the strategies, and focus are nearly the same: create a coalition, bring in recreation and tourists, kill industry, and all will be well.

The Bears Ears Monument Featured story in Canyon Country Zephyr

Response to Jim's article:

Read the whole article
Drawing by Jeff Byrd


This lengthly artive provides a great delineation of events leading to the current crisis at Bears Ear, told with insight and honesty. I think that “outliers” bring a different insight to any discussion, and you’ve represented us well in the discussion. As one who has been fighting Bears Ears monument for 6 months now, it is refreshing to actually have someone report more of the breadth of the conflict, and the new concerns that have developed concerning national monuments. Monuments are not the panacea of protection, as extreme greens would have us believe.

I am also glad you further exposed the heavy handed, financially wealthy lobby that pits itself against rural Americans, whether in SE Utah, or the tiny islands of Hawaii, the rangelands of Oregon, Nevada, California, & Arizona or the tiny communities of West Virginia. Their modus operandi is usually the same: exaggerate the damage being done, rally indigenous people to to be the banner carriers (by dangling money carrots), portray local people as dumb redneck looters, and attack cattle and industry as the enemy. After hearing these repetitive arguments time and time again, you soon realize that rural America is at the bottom of their priority list and they will buy their way to power, rather than compromise or negotiate.  No wonder we have drawn a line in the sand.

San Juan County is already home to six federal designations/destinations: Natural Bridges, Hovenweep, Canyonlands, Dark Canyon and Grand Gulch Wilderness areas, and Glen Canyon Recreation Area. Only 8% of our San Juan County’s 5,077,120 acres is privately owned. We are the poorest of 29 counties in the State. We need jobs and a tax base and multiple use of local land not another monument. Some areas in that coveted land, do NOT meet the definition of “public” land, including 43 grazing allotments, 661 water-right infrastructures, 151,000 acres of state trust land, and 18,000 acres of private property, as well as hundreds of miles of roads and infrastructure. 

There is a very good reason we are not happy with yet another possible National Monument designation. And yes, we do not want to become another Moab…even if we do like a lot of the people who have to live there.

Read the whole article

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Letter to President's Energy Advisor

Dear Brian Deese, Senior Energy Advisor,

Let me count the ways the Inter-Tribal Coalition Proposal for a Bears Ears Monument is Divisive, Defective, and, Discriminatory:

Designation of such a gigantic National Monument is a privilege that President Obama has already used to excess.  He and his environmental cronies have preyed upon the public lands of the West using multi-million dollar campaigns and media spin to justify such actions.  And you wonder why a line has to be drawn in the sand?  Those ill-conceived extreme actions in Utah, Oregon, Nevada, Hawaii, California, Maine and Arizona are still negatively reverberating throughout the country.  Such actions are contrary to federal laws, and the Bears Ears proposal has disaster written all over it. 

 Initially the proposal by the Coalition - though perhaps well intended by some – has now started to unravel.  The campaign has relied excessively on the power of money instead of truth, which gathered in leaders who could be bought.  Local Native People, are not so easily hoodwinked, and voted out some of these coalition representatives in the last election.  Top down, hand-picked coalition leaders do not, and will never represent a whole tribe, especially ones who never had a chance to vote on such a designation and whose relatives left this area for very good reasons of their own centuries ago.

Rural Americans. Native and Anglo alike, who live and depend upon this rural landscape in San Juan county have been good stewards.  Like urban residents, we too are upset when looting happens in our neighborhoods.  We don’t condone it, nor do we initiate it. We are tired of being categorized in that way, as you would be too, if the national press only publicized looting and destruction in the cities you live in.  We are one of the poorest counties in the nation, and we resent this discriminatory act which would further curtail our chances of economic success. Our county needs multi-use sections of land to support water, power, and road infrastructure, as well as schools, hospitals, and other facilities. The Federal Government does not have a good track record in paying their bills nor in dealing with rural people. Another Monument in Utah will only cause more problems and mistrust.  We cannot jeopardize important services and education by stopping energy production. Nor can tourists afford to drive to this isolated area, without fuel.  

This proposal is very divisive.
The proposal requests actions by the Secretaries and the President that are clearly contrary to law. As an NGO, the Coalition lacks jurisdiction to make such a request, and the proposal itself disregards no less than 18 land use planning efforts.  A NGO should never -- no matter how much foreign money it accepts -- have the power to trump sovereign State rights, nor duly elected officials.  No one in the Four Corners area voted for SUWA, CLF, or Grand Old Broads for their representatives.  Globalists and extreme environmental organizations which seek to weaken this republic, do not represent us.

The POTUS has certain steps that must be complied with prior to designating a monument. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) is supposed to be reviewed and managed in accordance with this act. The Advance Research Projects Agency (ARPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Park Service Preservation statutes have hoops that need to be jumped through.

At the state level the State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO) are all supposed to be contacted and considered. We question whether an environmental assessment has even been completed, yet it’s a rule designated by CEQ.  These are just a few of the reasons we are so against, having another National Monument in the State of Utah, and in our backyard.  Utah has already committed 66% of their land to the “public” for various state and federal parks or monuments. What have we gotten back:  Over-promoted areas attracting herds of tourists more concerned about taking selfies against a beautiful backdrop than protecting the culture and history. If you want to have this land truly protected, work with local county residents; get them on your side, and scale this gigantic 1.9 million acres to a Conservancy area in the Cedar Mesa area only. 
Additional reasons why I am against a Monument are contained in this document. http://sanjuancounty.org/documents/Advisability%20of%20Designating%20the%20Bears%20Ears.pdf
Sincerely,

Janet Wilcox, co-founder of Blue Mountain Shadows

A Region Magazine of culture and history serving the Four Corners Area 

Monday, December 5, 2016

Letter to Pres. Obama's Advisers this week.

Let me count the ways the Inter-Tribal Coalition Proposal for a Bears Ears Monument is Divisive, Defective, and, Discriminatory:

Designation of such a gigantic National Monument is a privilege that President Obama has already used to excess. He and his environmental cronies have preyed upon the public lands of the West using multi-million dollar campaigns and media spin to justify such actions. And you wonder why a line has to be drawn in the sand? 

Those ill-conceived extreme actions in Utah, Oregon, Nevada, Hawaii, California, Maine and Arizona are still negatively reverberating throughout the country. Such actions are contrary to federal laws, and the Bears Ears proposal has disaster written all over it. 

Initially the proposal by the Coalition - though perhaps well intended by some – has now started to unravel. The campaign has relied excessively on the power of money instead of truth, which gathered in leaders who could be bought. Local Native People, are not so easily hoodwinked, and voted out some of these coalition representatives in the last election. Top down, hand-picked coalition leaders do not, and will never represent a whole tribe, especially ones who never had a chance to vote on such a designation and whose relatives left this area for very good reasons of their own centuries ago. 

Rural Americans, Native and Anglo alike, who live and depend upon this rural landscape in San Juan county have been good stewards. Like urban residents, we too are upset when looting happens in our neighborhoods. We don’t condone it, nor do we initiate it. We are tired of being categorized in that way, as you would be too, if the national press only publicized looting and destruction in the cities you live in. We are one of the poorest counties in the nation, and we resent this discriminatory act which would further curtail our chances of economic success. Our county needs multi-use sections of land to support water, power, and road infrastructure, as well as schools, hospitals, and other facilities. 

The Federal Government does not have a good track record in paying their bills nor in dealing with rural people. Another Monument in Utah will only cause more problems and mistrust. We cannot jeopardize important services and education by stopping energy production. Nor can tourists afford to drive to this isolated area, without fuel. This proposal is very divisive.

The proposal requests actions by the Secretaries and the President that are clearly contrary to law. As an NGO, the Coalition lacks jurisdiction to make such a request, and the proposal itself disregards no less than 18 land use planning efforts. A NGO should never -- no matter how much foreign money it accepts -- have the power to trump sovereign State rights, nor duly elected officials. No one in the Four Corners area voted for SUWA, CLF, or Grand Old Broads for their representatives. Globalists and extreme environmental organizations which seek to weaken this republic, do not represent us.

The POTUS has certain steps that must be complied with prior to designating a monument. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) is supposed to be reviewed and managed in accordance with this act. The Advance Research Projects Agency (ARPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Park Service Preservation statutes have hoops that need to be jumped through. 

At the state level the State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO) are all supposed to be contacted and considered. We question whether an environmental assessment has even been completed, yet it’s a rule designated by CEQ. These are just a few of the reasons we are so against, having another National Monument in the State of Utah, and in our backyard. Utah has already committed 66% of their land to the “public” for various state and federal parks or monuments. What have we gotten back: Over-promoted areas attracting herds of tourists more concerned about taking selfies against a beautiful backdrop than protecting the culture and history. If you want to have this land truly protected, work with local county residents; get them on your side, and scale this gigantic 1.9 million acres to a Conservancy area in the Cedar Mesa area only. 

Additional reasons why I am against a Monument are contained in this document. http://sanjuancounty.org/.../Advisability%20of...

Sunday, December 4, 2016

Megabucks Manipulation Involved in Monument Lobby



Learn how Monumental Megabucks are generated and used against rural states as they fight to defend 
water rights, family businesses, and multiple use of land. Swiss billionaire, Hansjorg Wyss has done more to promote the capture of public land in the United States via the creation of new National Monuments than any person on earth. He does this by donating to multiple environmental groups, such as Conservation Lands Foundation.  
Published in Range Magazine, Winter issue 2017. Read the 4 page article by Montana writer,Dave Skinner.