Showing posts with label Tree for all. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tree for all. Show all posts

Friday, February 10, 2017

Stewards of San Juan Organize

Dec. 2016


Those who helped at the December 2016 event: Wendy Black, Suzette Morris, Jami Bayles and their
children.  Janet Wilcox also helped. 
Though nearly 1500 passionate San Juan County citizens had been actively engaged in the Bears Ears Public Lands battle since June of 2016, the group never really had an official name, nor elected officers or leaders.  They communicated via a private Facebook page. Anyone who had a "great" idea just bounced off ideas in the group and moved ahead independently. Since there was no money generated by the group at that time, everyone volunteered both time and resources to the idea they hoped would help the cause of defending State's Right and Rescinding the Bears Ears Monument.
 In December some of the group determined to participate in annual Festival of Trees. There they sold shirts, decals, and disseminated information. This helped to generate a money for mailing expenses primarily and for dissemination of information.  The booth is pictured above and it was set up for both days of the event.  We took turns manning it.  


It was at this time when needed a banner, that we came up with Stewards of San Juan as an identifying name.  We also used an existing logo designed by Mark Bradford on the banner, which showed so many of the unique and special places in San Juan County.


The next year, Feb 2017, the group finally organized.  By now there were nearly 2000 people involved in the FB group.  Officers were elected and again they used Stewards of San Juan for their logo and official name. Voted in as president was Jami Bayles, Vice Presidents: Ryan Benally, and Suzette Morris, Secretary-Eva Clarke Workman, and Treasurer-Wendy Black.  Publicity and newsletter were handled by Janet Wilcox.  

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Bear Essentials Nov. 27, 2016

Nov. 20-Dec. 3  Bear Necessities

The election of Donald Trump has NOT slowed down the opposition.  Pro-monument forces are filling newspapers and TV ads with half truths and scare tactics as they push for more National Monuments.  Please, please let your voice be heard. Write, and then respond when others publish articles; follow the news whether on TV, radio, newspaper and exercise your freedom of speech.

Facts relative to the Antiquities act that could be used (Thanks Wendy Black): 
The Antiquities Act is no longer a stand-alone privilege of the POTUS (President of the U.). Since the incorporation of the National Park Service it now requires the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to implement the obligations that balance human and natural environments. The Antiquities Act is not supposed to be used until an inventory of private inholdings have been done and have been distinguished from lands owned and controlled by the federal government. In accordance with the FLPMA mandates, the Antiquities Act is to be identified and confined to the smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects to be protected, (not 1.9 million acres). The objects are to be situated on land owned or controlled by the federal government. The Act is limited to objects, items and structures. All others are to be in accordance with FLPMA mandates. There are six procedural requirements that are to be performed in order to enact the Antiquities Act.

1.      Scientific studies to assess the range, occurrence and proper care of objects.
2.      The Secretary is to create and publish inventories that distinguish public land from inholdings, such as; water rights, mining claims, state and private inholdings, grazing allotments, easements and rights of way.
3.      The Antiquities Act is supposed to contain the smallest area compatible with proper care of objects to be protected by said Act.
4.      The corporate or private in holders are to be notified of their rights to participate or relinquish their rights in a timely manner.
5.      Local input is to be sought in what constitutes proper care and management of the objects for protection.
6.      State and local inholdings need to be identified for tax, impaired right of way, affected water rights, safety or any other problems that may arise from premature designation.

--I’ve updated and revised the links on my Bears Ears blog several times, and finally have a pretty good collection of newspaper e-mail addresses (copy and paste) as you send letters out. (https://beyondthebears.blogspot.com/)

--This article in the Huffinton Post needs responses.  The headline reads: “In The Weeks Before Trump Takes Office, Obama’s Mad Dash To Save Public Lands” (scroll down to where it shows how many comments there are…click and join the discussion.)


--A similar article in the Guardian

--A very good link provided by Linda Patterson regarding multiple-use of lands. This was a public symposium discussing many different land issues. Two-day event with 18 different topics discussed/ video taped. Very informative, especially for those directly involved in land issues in the west. Use some of these facts as you write.

--Allowing states to regulate the energy resources on federal lands means more efficient and accountable management. States share the cost of the maintenance of federal lands and have regulatory structures to manage federal lands within their boundaries.  Read more about it.
--Attached is a file explaining The Federal Land Freedom Act: Empowering States to Regulate Energy Will Yield Better Economic and Environmental Results Testimony before Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources U.S. House of Representatives.  This could be the basis of a very powerful letter to the editor.  I hope several of you will write and send letters.

--Come to the Tree for All Dec. 2-3 Wellness Center.   We will have a booth there.